anchor@anchor-cyber:~$ cat ir-plan-structure.md
Anchor Cyber Security
Anchor Cyber Security LLC

IR Plan Structure Reference

NIST SP 800-61 Rev 2 — required plan sections, four-phase response lifecycle, and tabletop exercise scenario types for IR planning and testing.

$ ir-plan --phases

Four-Phase Response Lifecycle — NIST SP 800-61 Rev 2

NIST SP 800-61 structures incident response as four phases. The phases are a lifecycle, not a strict sequence — detection and analysis continue throughout containment, and lessons learned feed back into preparation.

Phase 1Preparation§ 3.1
  • Establish and document the IR policy, plan, and procedures before an incident occurs
  • Define roles and responsibilities: IR lead, executive sponsor, legal, PR, IT, affected business units
  • Maintain and test the call tree and escalation path — verify contact info quarterly
  • Pre-authorize external resources: IR retainer, forensics firm, legal counsel, cyber insurer hotline
  • Identify and inventory critical systems, data flows, and crown-jewel assets
  • Establish and baseline logging for key systems; verify log completeness before an incident reveals gaps
  • Conduct tabletop exercises at minimum annually; update the plan after each exercise
  • Maintain offline or out-of-band copies of the IR plan and contact lists
Phase 2Detection & Analysis§ 3.2
  • Establish an initial incident severity rating (P1/P2/P3 or equivalent) at first detection
  • Document all observations with timestamps from the moment detection begins — this becomes evidence
  • Determine the attack vector, affected systems, and scope of compromise before concluding analysis
  • Distinguish between an incident and an event: an event is any observable occurrence; an incident is one that violates policy or causes harm
  • Use indicators of compromise (IoCs) to expand scope — adversaries rarely stop at one system
  • Notify appropriate internal stakeholders per the escalation matrix based on severity
  • Preserve volatile evidence (running processes, memory, network connections) before containment changes system state
  • Engage legal counsel before communicating externally about the incident
Phase 3Containment, Eradication & Recovery§ 3.3
  • Containment: isolate affected systems while preserving forensic evidence; make isolation decisions with business continuity in mind
  • Choose short-term containment (network segmentation, blocking) vs. long-term containment (reimaging, credential rotation) based on dwell-time confidence
  • Eradication: identify and remove all attacker artifacts — malware, persistence mechanisms, backdoor accounts, scheduled tasks
  • Confirm eradication is complete before beginning recovery; re-infection during recovery is the most common failure mode
  • Recovery: restore systems from known-good backups or clean builds; apply patches before bringing systems back online
  • Monitor restored systems more intensively post-recovery for signs of re-compromise
  • Issue external notifications on the legally required schedule — do not wait for full eradication before notifying regulators if timelines require earlier action
  • Document every containment and eradication action taken with timestamps
Phase 4Post-Incident Activity§ 3.4
  • Conduct a lessons-learned meeting within two weeks of incident resolution — while events are fresh
  • Produce a written post-incident report covering: timeline, root cause, impact, actions taken, and recommendations
  • Update the IR plan, detection rules, and runbooks to close gaps revealed by the incident
  • Track all recommendations as formal remediation items with owners and deadlines
  • Retain all incident documentation per the organization's retention policy (check regulatory requirements — HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2 each have specifics)
  • Debrief the executive sponsor and board if the incident was material
$ ir-plan --required-sections

Required IR Plan Sections — what auditors and insurers expect to see

SectionRequired byWhat it must contain
Purpose & ScopeAll frameworksWhat the plan covers, which systems and data types are in scope, who it applies to
Roles & ResponsibilitiesHIPAA · SOC 2 · NISTIR team members, decision authority, backup contacts, external resource contacts
Incident ClassificationNIST · SOC 2Severity tiers (e.g., P1–P3), criteria for each tier, and who is notified at each level
Detection & Reporting ProceduresAll frameworksHow employees report suspected incidents, where reports go, initial triage steps
Containment & Eradication ProceduresAll frameworksSpecific steps for common incident types (ransomware, data breach, BEC, unauthorized access)
Communication PlanHIPAA · PCI DSS · SOC 2Internal escalation matrix, external notification contacts (regulator, insurer, legal), customer notification templates
Breach Notification TimelinesHIPAA · GDPR · state lawsRegulatory deadlines by data type and jurisdiction; who drafts and approves notifications
Evidence PreservationLegal · forensicsLog retention policy, chain of custody, forensic imaging procedures
Recovery ProceduresAll frameworksRestoration steps, backup verification, system hardening before reconnection
Testing & Review ScheduleHIPAA · SOC 2 · NISTHow often the plan is tested (tabletop, simulation), who reviews updates, version control
$ ir-plan --tabletop-scenarios

Tabletop Exercise Scenario Types

Tabletop exercises test decision-making and communication, not technical response. A well-run tabletop takes 2–4 hours, uses injects to evolve the scenario, and ends with a structured debrief — not just a retrospective discussion.

Ransomware
  • Activation and initial isolation decisions
  • Backup viability and restoration timeline
  • Regulatory notification triggers
  • Ransom payment decision authority
Business Email Compromise
  • Wire transfer recall procedures
  • Scope of mailbox compromise
  • Vendor and partner notification
  • Ongoing fraud detection gap
Data Breach / Exfiltration
  • Scope determination and data classification
  • Notification obligation triggers by jurisdiction
  • Forensic preservation vs. remediation tension
  • Customer and regulator communication
Insider Threat
  • HR and legal involvement from minute one
  • Evidence preservation without alerting subject
  • Access revocation timing
  • Scope of data access review
Supply Chain / Vendor Compromise
  • Third-party notification and access revocation
  • Lateral movement scope assessment
  • Contract and SLA implications
  • Alternate vendor activation
Phishing Campaign
  • Credential reset scope decisions
  • MFA bypass or device compromise assessment
  • Employee communication and awareness
  • Email filtering gap remediation